Modi's U-turn on lateral entry: Social justice or political pressure?

The decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to cancel the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) advertisement for lateral entry into the Indian bureaucracy has sparked a nationwide debate, highlighting the complex dynamics of social justice, reservations, and political manoeuvring within India. Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw defended the government’s reversal, asserting that the decision was motivated by Prime Minister Modi’s concern for social justice. However, this claim was swiftly challenged by Congress MP Jairam Ramesh, who argued that the move was not driven by altruistic concerns but rather by mounting pressure from opposition parties and dissenting voices within the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA).

Controversy surrounding lateral entry

Lateral entry into the Indian bureaucracy has been a contentious issue since its inception. The concept, which involves recruiting professionals from outside the traditional bureaucratic ranks into mid- or senior-level positions in government departments, was first implemented by the Modi government in 2018. The idea, recommended by the NITI Aayog in 2017 and rooted in earlier proposals from the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, was to infuse fresh talent and domain expertise into civil services. However, the absence of reservation provisions for Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) candidates in these recruitments has been a major sticking point.

 On August 18, 2024, the UPSC issued an advertisement for 45 posts across 24 ministries, to be filled through lateral entry. This recruitment was planned for key roles, including 10 joint secretaries and 35 director/deputy secretary posts, with appointments to be made by September 17. The advertisement immediately drew sharp criticism from opposition leaders, who accused the government of bypassing the reservation system and deliberately excluding candidates from SC, ST, and OBC communities.

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge labelled the lateral entry process as part of a “well-planned conspiracy” to undermine the reservation policy. He argued that the BJP was systematically excluding marginalized communities from government jobs, a sentiment echoed by other opposition figures such as Rahul Gandhi, Mayawati, and Akhilesh Yadav. The backlash was not limited to the opposition; key BJP allies within the NDA, including the Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) [LJP(RV)] led by Chirag Paswan and the Janata Dal-United [JD(U)], also voiced their discontent. The mounting pressure from these quarters led to the government’s decision to withdraw the UPSC advertisement. 

Government’s U-turn: Victory for social justice?

Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw sought to frame the government’s decision as a commitment to social justice, claiming that Prime Minister Modi was deeply concerned about the potential exclusion of SC, ST, and OBC candidates from the lateral entry process. According to Vaishnaw, the decision to cancel the advertisement was made to ensure that the recruitment process aligns with the principles of social equity and inclusiveness.

 In a letter to the UPSC chief, Union Minister Jitender Singh reiterated this narrative, stating that the prime minister believes that any move on lateral entry should be “aligned with social justice.” Singh’s letter, while emphasizing the government’s commitment to fair representation in government services, was also an attempt to diffuse the growing criticism from both the opposition and within the NDA. 

Chirag Paswan, whose party has a strong base among Dalits, welcomed the government’s decision, interpreting it as a sign that the Modi government listens to public concerns and is willing to course-correct when necessary. Paswan’s support is noteworthy, given his party’s earlier opposition to the lateral entry scheme. The JD(U), another NDA ally, also expressed satisfaction with the government’s decision, suggesting that the move reflected the NDA’s responsiveness to its allies’ concerns.

Jairam Ramesh’s challenge: Opposition’s perspective

However, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh was quick to challenge the government’s narrative. Ramesh dismissed the idea that the decision was rooted in a genuine concern for social justice, instead framing it as a political retreat forced by the opposition’s relentless pressure. He argued that the Modi government’s days of unilateral decision-making were over and that the cancellation of the UPSC advertisement was a clear indication that the BJP’s attempts to sideline the reservation policy had been thwarted. 

Ramesh’s critique taps into a broader narrative that has been gaining traction in opposition circles—that the Modi government, often accused of centralizing power and making decisions without sufficient consultation, is now being forced to reckon with a more assertive opposition. The Congress MP’s comments also highlight the ongoing struggle over the reservation policy, which has been a cornerstone of India’s efforts to promote social justice and address historical inequalities.

Broader implications 

The controversy over lateral entry and the subsequent U-turn by the Modi government underscores the complexities of governance in a diverse and politically charged environment like India. The lateral entry scheme, while intended to bring in specialized expertise, has faced persistent criticism for its perceived exclusion of marginalized communities. The government’s attempt to push forward with the scheme without addressing these concerns ultimately led to a political backlash that it could not afford to ignore.

The decision to cancel the UPSC advertisement also reflects the growing influence of opposition parties and dissenting voices within the NDA. The fact that key allies like the LJP(RV) and the JD(U) were willing to challenge the government on this issue suggests that the BJP’s dominance within the coalition may be weakening. This development could have considerable implications for the NDA’s cohesion as the country moves towards the next general election.

Moreover, the episode has reignited the debate over the role of reservations in India. While the lateral entry scheme was designed to enhance the efficiency and expertise of the bureaucracy, its perceived disregard for the reservation policy has alienated a big section of the population. The government’s eventual decision to cancel the advertisement can be seen as an acknowledgement of the importance of maintaining social justice in recruitment processes, even as it seeks to modernize and reform the bureaucracy.

The Modi government’s decision to cancel the UPSC advertisement for lateral entry into the bureaucracy has opened up a new chapter in the ongoing debate over reservations and social justice in India. While the government has sought to portray the move as a commitment to inclusiveness, opposition leaders like Jairam Ramesh have framed it as a victory for political pressure and a sign of the BJP’s diminishing ability to unilaterally shape policy. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the government will balance the need for bureaucratic reform with the imperative of ensuring social equity in its recruitment practices.

Watch video