/squirrels/media/media_files/2026/02/25/union-address-2026-02-25-12-57-45.png)
US President Donald Trump during his 2026 State of the Union address.
The 35 Million Question: Trump, Tariffs, and the Indo-Pak “Miracle”
Donald Trump has a new number for the history books: 35 million.
During his 2026 State of the Union address, the U.S. President didn't just claim credit for a ceasefire—he claimed to have prevented the erasure of a population the size of Canada. According to Trump, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif personally thanked him for stopping a nuclear apocalypse that was "seconds away."
But as the dust settles on the House Chamber, a familiar pattern emerges. One where Washington’s "transactional peace" meets New Delhi’s "strategic denial."
The Claim: Peace at the Point of a Tariff
Trump’s narrative is simple. In May 2025, following the Pahalgam terror attack and India's subsequent Operation Sindoor, the subcontinent was on the brink.
Trump’s weapon of choice? Not a carrier strike group, but a 200% tariff threat. "I called them, and I said, 'listen, I'm not doing trade deals with you two guys if you don't settle this up,'" Trump told lawmakers.
Is it possible that the global supply chain, rather than diplomatic backchannels, halted a nuclear exchange?
/filters:format(webp)/squirrels/media/media_files/2026/02/25/his-2026-state-of-the-union-address-2026-02-25-13-02-17.png)
The Systemic Gap: New Delhi vs. Islamabad
The reaction to this "saviour" narrative has split along predictable geopolitical lines.
The Pakistan Side: Shehbaz Sharif has leaned into the narrative, calling Trump a "man of peace" and a "saviour of South Asia." For a cash-strapped Islamabad, acknowledging Trump’s role is a low-cost way to maintain favor with a tariff-happy White House.
The Indian Side: The silence is loud. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar previously dismissed such claims with a dry "Trump was in the US." New Delhi maintains the ceasefire was a result of direct DGMO-to-DGMO contact on the military hotline.
Fact-Checking the 35 Million
Where did the number come from? In 2025, Trump claimed he saved "millions." By early 2026, it was "10 million." Now, at the SOTU, it has peaked at 35 million.
There is no independent casualty projection from the 2025 standoff that matches this figure. While a full-scale nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan would indeed be catastrophic, the "35 million" figure appears to be a rhetorical flourish rather than a briefed intelligence stat.
The Stakeholders: Who Wins?
Donald Trump: He solidifies his image as the "ultimate dealmaker" ahead of the midterms.
Shehbaz Sharif: He secures a diplomatic lifeline and potential trade leniency.
The Indian Establishment: They lose nothing by staying silent, provided the LoC remains quiet.
What Happens Next?
The 2025 conflict—marked by India’s strikes on Nur Khan and Rahim Yar Khan airbases—was the closest the world has come to a nuclear flashpoint this decade. Whether it was Trump’s tariffs or regional fatigue that stopped the war, the precedent is set: Washington now views South Asian peace as a trade negotiation.
FAQ
1. What was Operation Sindoor? India's 2025 military response to the Pahalgam terror attack, involving air strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan.
2. Did Trump actually mediate the ceasefire? Trump claims he did via tariff threats; India denies any third-party involvement, citing direct military talks.
3. Why is Shehbaz Sharif praising Trump? Islamabad seeks to maintain strong ties with the Trump administration amidst economic volatility.
4. How many planes were shot down? Trump has claimed varying numbers, ranging from 10 to 11, though official counts from both nations differ.
The Bottom Line: In the theater of the SOTU, 35 million is a powerful prop. In the theater of South Asian reality, the ceasefire remains a fragile, bilateral understanding that Washington is more than happy to claim and bill as its own.
/squirrels/media/agency_attachments/Grmx48YPNUPxVziKflJm.png)
Follow Us